Legal Opinion

King v. Anthony

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Assumpsit by the administrator of Jonathan-Anthony, against Thornberry and his wife, administratrix, and King, administrator, of James Anthony. There is no return of the writ in the record, nor a suggestion, showing that any of the defendants had not been found.. King appeared and pleaded, first, ndn-assumpsit; secondly, the statute of limitations; thirdly, plene administravit. Issue was joined on the first plea. To the second, there were two replications: one, that the case was within an exception of the statute; the other,-denying the plea generally. Rejoinder and issue, as to the first…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairfax's v. FairfaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Siglar and Nall, Administrators of William Nall, Deceased, in Error v. John Haywood, Public Treasurer of the State of North Carolina, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1823

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schoonover v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Bales v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Sutliff v. ForgeyNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  4. M'Manus v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Platt v. RobinsNew York Supreme Court · 1800

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API