King v. Anthony
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
Assumpsit by the administrator of Jonathan-Anthony, against Thornberry and his wife, administratrix, and King, administrator, of James Anthony. There is no return of the writ in the record, nor a suggestion, showing that any of the defendants had not been found.. King appeared and pleaded, first, ndn-assumpsit; secondly, the statute of limitations; thirdly, plene administravit. Issue was joined on the first plea. To the second, there were two replications: one, that the case was within an exception of the statute; the other,-denying the plea generally. Rejoinder and issue, as to the first…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fairfax's v. FairfaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Siglar and Nall, Administrators of William Nall, Deceased, in Error v. John Haywood, Public Treasurer of the State of North Carolina, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schoonover v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Bales v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Sutliff v. ForgeyNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- M'Manus v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
- Platt v. RobinsNew York Supreme Court · 1800
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.