Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1939No. 6 Div. 403PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Action by passenger on a railway train for personal injuries sustained through derailment of the coach upon which she was a passenger.

The governing principles of law in such case have been frequently considered and applied in our decisions.

In Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. Mallette, 92 Ala. 209, 9 So. 363, 365, the law defining the degree of care and the presumption of negligence from the fact of derailment is thus stated:

“There was no error in the charges of the court to the effect that ‘the law required the highest degree of care and diligence and skill, by those…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Tullis v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Weber v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Little v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Mobile Cab & Baggage Co. v. BusbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Greyhound Corporation v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Cannon v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API