Legal Opinion

Shadford v. Ann Arbor Street Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by John H. Shadford against the Ann Arbor Street Railway Company for personal injuries. From a iudgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

On September 29, 1894, plaintiff, then about 23 years of age, was employed by the defendant company in the capacity of a lineman, and was engaged with one Wilson in constructing a curve in the trolley wire of defendant’s street-railway equipment at the junction of Wells street and Forest avenue, in the city of Ann Arbor. In the performance of his work, plaintiff stood on a platform of the dimensions of 8 by 4 feet, erected upon a common lumber wagon. This platform was about 14 feet above the ground, the workmen being protected by a railing, 2 feet high, erected on three sides of the platform.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Allen's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw Railroad v. GildersleeveMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brands v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Lively v. American Zinc Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Omaha Bottling Co. v. TheilerNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Shadford v. Ann Arbor Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Burnside v. Novelty Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API