Goodwin v. Union Insurance Co. of Philadelphia
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by William P. Goodwin against the Union Insurance Company of Philadelphia on a policy of insurance. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.
This is an action upon a Michigan standard fire insurance policy to recover for a loss which the plaintiff suffered to his saloon and café in Mt. Clemens on the 31st day of December, 1906. The total amount of insurance carried by the plaintiff was $10,000, divided among several companies. The policy in suit was one for $1,500. The claimed loss was $5,936.19. The jury found that the loss was $5,388, and apportioned $808.30 of this sum to the policy in suit, and judgment was rendered for that amount against the defendant. A motion for a new trial was made and denied, and defendant assigns error…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Hogadone v. Grange Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Kaufman v. State Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Cascade Fire & Marine Insurance v. Journal Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1890
- Bangs v. BrowneMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Detroit Life Insurance v. LinsenmierMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Smith v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913