Legal Opinion

Smith v. American Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1913No. Docket No. 130PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Assumpsit by Edward P. Smith and Carrie Smith against the American Insurance Company on a policy of fire insurance. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action on a policy of fire insurance issued by the defendant covering a dwelling house, then owned by plaintiffs, and situate in the city of Lansing. At the close of the proofs defendant moved the court to direct a verdict, which motion was overruled. Defendant thereupon submitted certain requests to charge, which were refused by the court. Verdict and judgment were in favor of plaintiffs for $717.50, which was the full amount of the policy and interest. The case is here by writ of error.

The facts are as follows: At the time of the issuance of the policy plaintiffs were the owners…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hall v. Concordia Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hogadone v. Grange Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Reliance Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Mosee v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API