Legal Opinion
Matson Ex Rel. Kehoe v. Anctil
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided October 1, 1997No. 2:96-cv-00110PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
In this personal injury action, Defendants Richard Anetil and Materiaux Blanchet, Inc. (“MBI”) have moved for leave to assert third party claims against the parents of Plaintiff Emily Matson (“Emily”). Emily has moved for partial summary judgment, seeking this Court’s ruling that as a matter of law the Defendants ‘cannot prevail in their claim that her injuries “were the result of negligence on the part of the Plaintiff or other third parties, which negligence was greater in kind and degree than the negligence, if any, of the [Defendants 1 ].” Amended…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TherrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Carleton v. Killington/Pico Ski Resort Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2024
- Matson Ex Rel. Kehoe v. AnctilDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1998