Legal Opinion

State v. Therrien

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 16, 2003No. 02-108PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. After her husband, the late Andrew Therrien, was found to have violated Act 250, 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6108, and the Consumer Fraud Act, 9 V.S.A. §§ 2451-2480g, in connection with septic and water systems located on his Salem Heights development in the Town of Derby, defendant Carolyn Therrien, executrix of her late husband’s estate, brought a third-party claim against attorney Gregory Howe for the alleged negligence of Howe and his late partner in preparing the deeds that defendant claims were the cause of the estate’s liability. On Howe’s motion, the trial court granted summary judgment in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. White v. Quechee Lakes Landowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Gertz v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. BrockmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Estate of Fleming v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. DevoidSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. Bloomer v. GibsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. Allen v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. FordSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. White v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API