Legal Opinion
In Re Guidant Shareholders Derivative
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 2006No. 94S00-0407-CQ-318PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
841 N.E.2d 571 (2006)
In re GUIDANT SHAREHOLDERS DERIVATIVE LITIGATION.
Kelbourne J. Ritter, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald W. Dollens, et al., Defendants.
No. 94S00-0407-CQ-318.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
February 2, 2006.
Irwin B. Levin, Richard E. Shevitz, Scott D. Gilchrist, Eric S. Pavlack, James A.L. Buddenbaum, Anthony W. Patterson, Indianapolis, Darren J. Robbins, Randall J. Baron, Kevin K. Green, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.
James H. Ham, III, John R. Schaibley, III, Indianapolis, Boris Feldman, Nina F. Locker, Keith E. Eggleton, Cheryl W. Foung, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendants.
Karl L.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Cuker v. MikalauskasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Boland v. EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Wayne Pike Co. v. HammonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- James D. Massey and Dennis E. Murray, Sr. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Johnston v. BoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- In Re ITT Derivative LitigationIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- TP Orthodontics, Inc. v. KeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re F5 Networks, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.