Legal Opinion

In Re ITT Derivative Litigation

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2010No. 94S00-0911-CQ-508PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

In 1986, the Indiana General Assembly adopted a new framework for business corporations. Broadly put, this case turns on whether that framework largely relies on business judgments by corporate directors in deciding whether a company should pursue certain claims it might have, or instead looks favorably to derivative suits initiated by individual stockholders. 'We conclude that the statute's text, its history, and our caselaw militate in favor of the former.

In particular, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has asked us about the standards to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Prewitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Stone v. RitterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. TP Orthodontics, Inc. v. KeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Darryl Calvin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. MERIDIAN FINANCIAL ADVISORS, LTD. v. PenceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011
  4. State of Indiana v. Sameer Girish ThakarIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Carter Ex Rel. CNO Financial Group, Inc. v. HilliardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API