Legal Opinion
Toyo Tire Corporation v. Atturo Tire Corporation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 9, 2021No. 1:14-cv-00206Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TOYO TIRE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 14-cv-00206 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland ATTURO TIRE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Toyo Tire Corporation and Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. (collectively, “Toyo”), brought this action against Defendants Atturo Tire Corporation (“Atturo”) and Svizz- One Corporation Ltd. (“Svizz-One”) asserting a number of claims including that Defendants infringed the trade dress on Toyo’s Open Country Mountain Tires (“OPMT” tires). The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Skiba v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.