Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tracy v. Dandurand

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 14, 2000No. SC 82316PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFF, Judge.

Does a party continue to have an attorney-client privilege as to documents that the party has provided to its retained expert witness who is designated to testify? While trial courts frequently confront the subject of discovery as to retained experts, the question presented here appears to be one of first impression in this Court.

The expert witness in this case had reviewed the documents and gave them to opposing counsel at the witness’ deposition, but the trial court entered an order prohibiting use of the documents. Because Rule 56.01(b)(4) allows discovery by deposition of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Butler v. Mitchell-Hugeback, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Karn v. RandDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. B.C.F. Oil Refining, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Christus Spohn Hospital KlebergTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Hancock v. ShookSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Vulgamott v. PerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Sparks v. SparksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Edwards v. Missouri State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API