State v. Knaff
Ohio Court of Appeals
1DissentHildebrandt, Presiding Judge
I must dissent from the decision of my colleagues holding that the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions bar Knaff s felony conviction for failure to comply. The majority employs an overly mechanical reading of the cases interpreting when jeopardy attaches to a plea before a trial judge, with the result that double jeopardy protection is extended to situations never contemplated by the state or federal Constitutions.
The Double Jeopardy Clause protects a criminal defendant against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, a second prosecution for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- State v. AkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.