Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Brune

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1975No. 58550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY I. EAGER, Special Commissioner.

The defendant appeals from a conviction for the violation of a St. Louis City ordinance designed to prevent lead poisoning in dwelling units. He raises, though somewhat inadequately here, the constitutional validity of the ordinance. The issue was raised in the trial court. On that ground we accept jurisdiction.

The ordinance, 56091, approved January 27, 1972, repealed a prior ordinance and provided in substance (in so far as necessary here) as follows: that its purpose was “to detect, treat and prevent lead poisoning resulting from the internal consumption…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. State v. PetrechkoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. McCallister v. PriestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Priest v. GunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Ex Parte CavanaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Craig v. City of MacOnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Cocktail Fortune, Inc. v. Supervisor of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Browning-Ferris Industries of Kansas City, Inc. v. DanceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. DuggarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Harjoe v. Herz FinancialSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API