Legal Opinion
Estate of Uhl
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1969No. 26299PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
On this appeal by Lora T. Bott from an order denying her petition for heirship and for appointment as coexecutor of the decedent's will, the contentions are that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that the decedent intended to partially revoke his will, and that the court erred in applying the doctrine of dependent relative revocation.
The appeal is on a settled statement. The testator, Charles Uhl, died on September 7, 1967, a resident of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeParcq v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Cuneo v. MondaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Olmsted v. BussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Estate of MartensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Estate of CummingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Isaac v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- De Paul v. IrwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997