Legal Opinion
David Pepe v. Marirosa Lamas
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 16, 2017No. 16-3195UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
David Pepe appeals the District Court’s dismissal of a suit against several SCI-Benner Township prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that they retaliated against him for the exercise of his First Amendment rights. The claim involves a grievance that Pepe filed challenging the veracity of a misconduct charge issued against him by the supervisor for prison kitchen work, Michael Prevost. The charge resulted in Pepe’s removal from his kitchen job assignment, and he alleged that the subsequent denial of his request to be reinstated into his former job was made in retaliation…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Mark Mitchell v. Martin F. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Burgos v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- AKUBU v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ANDREWS v. UNIT MANAGER BEHRDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Devin Coleman v. Dr. Shyam S. SingareddyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- FLEMING v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.