Legal Opinion
E & F REALTY CO. v. Commissioner of Transportation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 5, 1977PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
These two cases arise from the defendant’s condemnation for highway purposes of two separate portions of a parcel of land owned by the plaintiff. By agreement of the parties, the cases were consolidated for trial and by stipulation, pursuant to the provisions of § 606 of the Practice Book, as amended, appeals from the judgments in the two cases were combined for appeal to this court. Upon the taking of each parcel, the defendant filed a statement of compensation and as to each the plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court from the assessment of damages, claiming that the compensation was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Bowen v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Muha v. United Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- D'ADDARIO v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ratner v. WillametzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.