Legal Opinion

Adams v. Mellon

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 27, 1930No. 37517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODWARD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, 103 in number, members of tbe Chicago Live Stock Exchange, bring tbis suit against Andrew Mellon, Director General of Railroads, and Union Stock Yard & Transit Company, under section 16 of tbe Act to Regulate Commerce (49 USCA § 16) to recover from tbe defendants jointly $140,001.25, with interest, awarded to plaintiffs in a reparations order entered by the Interstate Commerce Commission on December 12, 1927, which sum has not been paid.

At tbe conclusion of all tbe evidence, tbe defendants separately made motions to instruct tbe jury to return a verdict in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Davis v. Portland Seed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re International Match CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  2. Adams v. MellonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. In re Marks' WillPalm Beach County Judge's Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API