Legal Opinion

In re Marks' Will

Palm Beach County Judge's Court

Decided July 20, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD P. ROBBINS, County Judge.

This cause came on before me on the petition of E. Albert Pallot for an order appointing him as the attorney to represent the estate of Samuel B. Marks, deceased, and the answer of Sylvia M. Fried-lander, requesting that the court instruct her as administratrix with the will annexed, of said estate, as to whether she has the right to appoint an attorney of her own choice to represent her as such administratrix cum testamento annexo.

In paragraph XIII, page 8, of the last will and testament of the deceased it is provided — “I direct that E. Albert Pallot of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re Estate of OgierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Pickett's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Rivet v. BattistellaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  4. In Re Lachmund's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Woodstown National Bank, C., Co. v. SnelbakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API