Builders Ltd. Mutual Liability Insurance v. Compensation Insurance Board
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Respondent members otP the compensation insurance board made return to an order of the district court for Ramsey county to show cause why their order fixing rates for compensation insurance and making them retroactive should not be vacated, and the court, Hanft, J., discharged the order. Relators then obtained from the supreme court a writ of certiorari directed to the district court and Hanft, J., to review his order.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The relator is a mutual insurance company organized under the laws of the state of Wisconsin and duly licensed to do> business in the state of Minnesota. Between February 1, 1921, and June 1, 1921, the relator entered into contracts of insurance with various employers in the state of Minnesota by which the relator insured such employers, for one year from the date of the respective policies, against the liabilities imposed upon them by the so-called workmen’s *428compensation laws of this state, for a specified and fixed percentage of the pay-rolls of each employer so insured.
The first…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gaston v. MerriamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- State ex rel. Anderson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Soderstrom v. Curry & Whyte, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Brown v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Wilson v. Red Wing School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- State v. Crete Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Thorman v. State Bank of WaverlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Corstvet v. Bank of DeerfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936