Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, J.,
for the Court.
SUMMARY OF THE CASE
¶ 1. This appeal requires an analysis of the consequences of a violation of the Confrontation Clause as discussed in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Our precise analysis involves circumstances in which: (1) the victim was physically present at trial; (2) on direct examination during the prosecution’s case-in-chief, the victim claimed a loss of memory; (3) the trial court determined the victim was therefore “unavailable” due to that alleged loss of memory; (4) the trial court found that the “unavailable”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Davis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Goforth v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- Amanda Goforth v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
- Kenivel Smith v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008