Legal Opinion

Houghton v. American Trust & Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1923No. 1401PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The American Trust & Savings Bank, as the holder in due course, brought this suit against the plaintiff in error, Houghton, as maker, and N. G. Buchoz- and W. H. Vance, as indorsers, to recover upon a promissory note in the sum of $1,300 executed by Houghton to order of Buchoz and Vance.

Houghton set up a cross-action against Buchoz, as follows:

“Further answering herein, this defendant says that on or about March 20, 1920, he was in the office of defendant N. G. Buehoz; that said Buchoz and this defendant had been close personal friends for many years; that while in the office of said Buchoz,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guarantee Life Ins. Co. v. DavidsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Ablowich v. Greenville National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Security Life Ins. Co. of America v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Frost v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wise v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Bashara v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. McCormack v. CockburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Federal American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Washington v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Thompson v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API