Legal Opinion

Wise v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1924No. 2377. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. A. Wise brought this suit against Rex Boyd and B. S. King on a note executed by said defendants, payable to I. G. Showers, and by him indorsed and transferred to plaintiff. Boyd did not answer. The defendant King contested recovery as against him on grounds hereinafter stated. The trial judge directed a verdict against Boyd, but in favor of defendant King, and judgment was rendered accordingly.

It is conceded that if the pleading and evidence made an issue as to King's liability on the note, a matter which we discuss later, yet the peremptory instruction could not be sustained on such…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dolson v. De GanahlTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Phillips v. MeilySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  4. Hall v. First National Bank of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Fairchild v. RasdallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. WiseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Miks v. LeathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Whiteman v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Williams v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. King v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API