Legal Opinion
Lemay v. Burnett
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 14, 1995No. 94-261PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiff, Larry L. Lemay, sued the defendant, Gloria Burnett, for injuries he allegedly suffered while diving into her swimming pool. Prior to trial, Lemay informed Burnett that he did not intend to call any expert witnesses to prove his case. Burnett moved to dismiss for lack of a swimming pool expert, arguing that the lawsuit presented scientific issues too complex for the jury to resolve unassisted. The Superior Court (Dickson, J.) granted the motion, and Lemay appealed. We affirm.
*634For the purposes of this appeal, the parties do not dispute the following facts. On August 3, 1991*…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Charles C. Randolph, D/B/A Hardens Fried Chicken v. Collectramatic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- District of Columbia v. FreemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. v. FortenberryMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Cummings v. Nazareth BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Beaudette v. Louisville Ladder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Estate of Joshua T. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. HungerfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Dayberry v. City of East HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Estate of Gordon-Couture v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.