Legal Opinion

State v. Kimsey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 12, 2002No. Z610761, Z610762 A107702 (Control), A107707PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

The state charged defendant with driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 816.010, reckless driving, ORS 811.170, and failure to perform the duties of a driver, ORS 811.700, arising from an automobile accident. Defendant’s first trial ended in a mistrial after the prosecutor asked the state’s witnesses questions that invited comment on defendant’s right to remain silent. Upon discharging the jury, the trial court obtained the jurors’ impressions of the case and conveyed those impressions to the prosecutor and defendant’s counsel in an effort to encourage plea negotiations in the case.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. D'AntonioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. CriswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API