Legal Opinion
United States v. Pollard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1975No. 74-1043PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*809OPINION
Before KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges, and VOORHEES,* District Judge. ELY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from a consent judgment and foreclosure decree in a mortgage foreclosure suit instituted by the United States. The United States is not a party to this appeal.
The District Court, pursuant to a cross-complaint filed by one Pollard, held that certain cross-defendants, Howard G. and Bertha Roberts (hereinafter “The Roberts”) were personally and primarily liable for payment of the $43,523.29 deficiency on a mortgage held and foreclosed by the Small Business Administration (SBA). In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anita T. Owens v. Raymond L. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Van Eman v. MosingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hulin v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Public Fire Insurance v. WeatherlyOregon Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Hing Bo Gum v. Mataichi NakamuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Schulz v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Ritzau v. Warm Springs WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Schulz v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.