Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sams v. Kirby

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2000No. 26647, 26909, 26910, 27308, 27309 and 26911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

I

BACKGROUND

Petitioners are all inmates who have been sentenced to what is commonly referred to as “prison,” i.e., they have been sentenced to terms of confinement in facilities of the West Virginia Division of Corrections (the “DOC”). However, such sentences notwithstanding, the petitioners remain confined in jails, which are not operated by the DOC. The record and arguments of counsel demonstrate that over 850 prisoners who have been sentenced to DOC facilities remain elsewhere, with approximately 450 of those in regional jails, and the remainder in county jails.

Petitioners call our…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. GwinnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Crain v. BordenkircherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Dodrill v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Smith v. SkaffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Crain v. BordenkircherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Berry v. McBrideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. Sams v. Commissioner, West Virginia Division of CorrectionsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State Ex Rel. Sams v. Commissioner, West Virginia Division of CorrectionsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API