Legal Opinion

Crain v. Bordenkircher

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1988No. 16646PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROTHERTON, Justice:

This proceeding originated in a consolidated action for habeas corpus instituted by the plaintiffs in 1981 to secure relief from conditions of imprisonment at the West Virginia Penitentiary in Moundsville. On June 10,1981, the Honorable Arthur M. Recht of the First Judicial Circuit was appointed to conduct the hearings and trial on the issue of whether the conditions of confinement at the West Virginia Penitentiary were unconstitutional as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article III, Section 5 of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Nazareth Gates, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. John Collier, Superintendent, Mississippi State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. SkaffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Crain v. BordenkircherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. NicastroWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Crain v. BordenkircherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API