Legal Opinion

People v. Murray

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1927No. Docket No. 1528PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial.

Pursuant to the preliminary examination, which resulted in the filing of information against appellant, the committing magistrate held him to answer on a charge of procuring money under false pretenses. The information which was filed thereafter charged him with that offense and with two others, the pleading consisting of three counts. At the trial, under a claim that they had first been informed of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. StaplesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People v. NogiriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. DanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. People v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. HarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. CasserioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Ervin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. TerkanianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API