Legal Opinion
Boehm v. Zimprich
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 17, 2014No. 14-cv-16-jdpPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Scott Boehm and David Stluka are professional photographers who specialize in sports photos, which they license on an exclusive basis through agencies such as Getty Images. In this copyright infringement suit, they allege that defendants created photo prints and canvases of their photos 'without authorization, and that they sold these items through their sports memorabilia shops and kiosks. The Zimpriches and Legends of the Field admit to copying and selling plaintiffs’ photos. Sports Plus admits that it acquired at least one of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wildlife Express Corporation v. Carol Wright Sales, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In Re: Aimster Copyright LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boehm v. Scheels All Sports, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- Design Basics, LLC v. Big C Lumber Co Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- HEBENSTREIT v. MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANADistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- Jeff Bartels v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule ADistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Roberts v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023