Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Scheels All Sports, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 17, 2016No. 15-cv-379-jdpPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge

Plaintiffs are sports photographers who accuse defendants, mostly sports memorabilia dealers, of making and selling unauthorized reproductions of their work. Some defendants have business insurance policies that may cover “advertising injury,” so those defendants tendered this case to their insurers, who intervened to contest coverage. Three of those insurers now move for summary judgment that their policies do not afford coverage for plaintiffs’ claims.

A basic business insurance policy will often include coverage for what is called “advertising…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Envirodyne Engineers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. HillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burclaw, Saramarie v. Standard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  2. Grant, Kevin v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API