Legal Opinion

Alagia, Day, Trautwein & Smith v. Broadbent

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1994No. 93-SC-631-DGPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

The underlying claim in this litigation is for negligence in connection with legal advice given by an attorney with respect to estate planning and gift taxes. On grounds that when brought the claim was time-barred by KRS 413.245, the trial court granted appellants’ motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and adopted the “continuous representation rule,” a doctrine of law which tolls the legal negligence statute of limitations so long as the attorney continues to represent the client in the matter. We affirm the Court of Appeals but upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Saylor v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  2. Capital Holding Corp. v. BaileyKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Munday v. Mayfair Diagnostic LaboratoryKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Michels v. SklavosKentucky Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Peoples Bank of Northern Kentucky, Inc. v. CROWE CHIZEK AND CO.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  2. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Smith v. StacyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Abel v. AustinKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Doe v. Golden & Walters, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API