Legal Opinion
Armando Venicassa v. Consolidation Coal Company and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 27, 1998No. 96-3736Published
1Opinion of the Court
137 F.3d 197
Armando VENICASSA, Petitioner,
v.
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY and Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
No. 96-3736.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Sept. 25, 1997.
Decided Feb. 27, 1998.
Robert L. Johnson (Argued), Paul A. Tershel, Tershel & Associates, Washington, PA, for Armando Venicassa.
J. Davitt McAteer, Acting Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor, Christian P. Barber, Jeffrey S. Goldberge (Argued), United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for Director, Office of Workers'…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gardebring v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- O'KEEFFE v. Aerojet-General Shipyards, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.