Hamilton v. Bechtel
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This appeal results from the trial court’s denial of Appellants Motion to Amend Complaint which was filed in order to substitute a new party for the one Appellants erroneously sued. The Motion was filed one year after the statute of limitations had run.
*392On February 27, 1992, Appellants initiated this lawsuit, alleging in their Complaint that on July 6,1990, Appellant wife was injured as a result of an automobile accident. Appellants averred that Appellee, John Bechtel, negligently operated the vehicle owned by Appellee, Shirley Bechtel, causing it to strike Appellant wife’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Hayward v. Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ferraro v. McCarthy-PascuzzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Anderson Equipment Co. v. HuchberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Wine v. Emsa Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Diaz v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth, Department of Commerce v. CarlowCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.