Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Bechtel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This appeal results from the trial court’s denial of Appellants Motion to Amend Complaint which was filed in order to substitute a new party for the one Appellants erroneously sued. The Motion was filed one year after the statute of limitations had run.

*392On February 27, 1992, Appellants initiated this lawsuit, alleging in their Complaint that on July 6,1990, Appellant wife was injured as a result of an automobile accident. Appellants averred that Appellee, John Bechtel, negligently operated the vehicle owned by Appellee, Shirley Bechtel, causing it to strike Appellant wife’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Hayward v. Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. McCarthy-PascuzzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Anderson Equipment Co. v. HuchberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Wine v. Emsa Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Diaz v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Commerce v. CarlowCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API