Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Harris

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 19, 1989No. 88-P-74PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal concerns the arbitrability of the question of identification of the owner or operator of a hit and run vehicle. The issue arose in a dispute between the insurer, the plaintiff, Allstate Insurance Company, and its insureds, the defendants, Deborah Harris and Joanne Albano, concerning the uninsured motorist clause (Coverage U) of the standard Massachusetts automobile insurance policy. A Superior Court judge decided that the issue was not arbitrable and vacated an award of damages made by an arbitrator. We conclude that the issue was arbitrable and reinstate the award.

The background…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. In Re Arbitration Between Rosenbaum & American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Fazio v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. Employers' Fire Insurance v. GarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PoirierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. C & I Steel, LLC v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Gilbert v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. Hernandez v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
  4. Scott v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Bergin v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API