Legal Opinion

In re Febrey

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1943No. 4723PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenkoot, Judge

This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1 to 5 inclusive of appellant’s application for a patent. The application relates to a “Standard Plug-Type Signal Bond.”

The claims were rejected upon the ground that the- invention claimed had been in public use for more than one year prior to the filing of his instant application.

The sole question before us is one of law, viz., whether appellant is entitled to the date of an earlier application filed by him for the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. EamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Ferdinand Gutmann Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Weston Electrical Instrument Co. v. Empire Electrical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tansel v. HigonnetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  2. Harder v. HaywardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  3. Galland-Henning Mfg. Co. v. Dempster Brothers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1970
  4. Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. Application of AronbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API