Legal Opinion

Harder v. Hayward

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 24, 1945No. 4966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Garrett, Presiding Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the. subject matter defined by the counts in issue (Nos. 1 to 6, inclusive) to appellee, Claude D. Hayward.

The interference is between appellants’ patent, No. 2,240,699, issued May 6,1941, on an application filed November 12,1938, and appellee’s application, serial No. 339,096, filed June 6,1940.

In appellee’s involved application it is stated that—

This…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. EamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Clark Blade & Razor Co. v. Gillette Safety Razor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
  3. In re FebreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  4. Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Clark Blade & Razor Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1911
  5. Dederick v. FoxU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Joseph E. Edge, Sr. v. Louis L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Tansel v. HigonnetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. Philip A. Hunt Co. v. Mallinckrodt Chemical WorksDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
  4. In re BaumanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. Application of WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API