Legal Opinion

Lacey Mark Sivak v. Judge David C. Nye and Stephen Kenyon

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided December 5, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00632Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO LACEY MARK SIVAK, Case No. 1:25-cv-00632-BLW Plaintiff, INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY v. SCREENING JUDGE JUDGE DAVID C. NYE and STEPHEN KENYON, Defendants. The Clerk of Court conditionally filed Plaintiff Lacey Mark Sivak’s initial pleading because of Plaintiff’s status as an inmate. A “conditional filing” means that a plaintiff must obtain authorization from the Court to proceed. Upon screening, the Court must dismiss claims that are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Joseph Jackson, II v. State of Arizona (Unknown) Terry, Deputy Acting Warden (Unknown) Avenenti, Deputy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API