Legal Opinion

Williams v. Ornamental Stone Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1950No. 377PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

It was not controverted that the claimant’s last exposure to the occupational disease of silicosis occurred while he was in the employ of defendant Stone Company, and that as against his employer compensation therefor was properly awarded. G.S. 97-58; Young v. Whitehall Co., 229 N.C. 360, 49 S.E. 2d 797.

The only question presented by the appeal is whether from the testimony introduced there was any evidence to support the finding of the Industrial Commission that the disease which caused the disablement of the claimant while in the employ of defendant Stone Company was within the coverage of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Kenan v. Duplin Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Miller v. . CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Chatfield v. Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  3. Barrington v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Godley v. County of PittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API