Legal Opinion
Scott v. Anderson
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 30, 1998No. 1:95-mj-02037PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Jay D. Scott petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Scott challenges the constitutional sufficiency of his jury convictions for aggravated robbery and aggravated murder, and also challenges the constitutionality of the trial court’s imposition of a sentence of death for his murder conviction.
For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART Scott’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Specifically, the Court finds that Scott’s challenges to the constitutionality of his underlying convictions are without…
2Cases cited108 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jamison v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Smith v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Lambert v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Zuern v. TateDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Moore v. MitchellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.