Shores v. Hutchinson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered August 30, 1911, dismissing on the merits an action for rescission, after a trial to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
This is an action by E. A. Shores and wife, against Ernest Hutchinson and wife, to set aside a transfer and conveyance by plaintiffs to the defendants of certain improved lots in the city of Tacoma, with the household furniture therein, certain timber lands in Thurston county, and certain standing timber in Jefferson county, made in exchange for three hundred twenty shares of the capital stock of Michigan Furniture Company, hereinafter called the company. The company had a capital stock of $150,000, divided into 1,500 shares, of a par value of $100 each. Twelve hundred and fifty-five shares,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Washington Central Improvement Co. v. NewlandsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Griffith v. StrandWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Best v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaas v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- O'Daniel v. StreebyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Wilson v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Standard Lumber Co. v. Deer Park Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Edge v. Business Men's Assur. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.