Legal Opinion

Cheffings v. Hines

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In. the case of Atchison etc. Ry. Co. v. Calhoun, 213 U. S. 1, 7 (53 L. Ed. 671, 29 Sup. Ct. *87Rep. 321, 322, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes), it was aptly observed by Mr. Justice Moody that:

“Few questions have more frequently come before the courts than that whether a particular mischief • was the result of a particular default. It would not be useful to examine the numerous decisions in which this question has received consideration, for no case exactly resembles another, and slight differences of facts may be of great importance. * * The law, in its practical administration, in cases of this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Galvin v. Brown & McCabeOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Ball v. GussenhovenMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Limberg v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Makino v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API