Legal Opinion

Tuohig v. Principal Insurance Group

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 13, 2001No. Civ.A. 00-40038NMGPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

The defendant has filed a “Partial Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss” (Docket No. 4) in which it seeks to dismiss Counts Two through Sixteen of the Complaint due to the alleged federal preemption of those claims. The plaintiffs oppose the motion.

I. Background

In January, 1996, while Stephen Tuohig (“Mr.Tuohig”) was employed by Automatic Tech and a participant in the health and welfare plan administered by the defendant, his wife, Marilyn Tuohig (“Mrs.Tuo-hig”), an insured under the plan, was diagnosed with breast cancer. The defendant paid the medical…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrews-Clarke v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. Miara v. First Allmerica Financial Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  3. Frommert v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
  4. Sterry Street Auto Sales Inc. v. Cummins Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  5. Willitts v. Life Insurance Company of North America (CIGNA)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API