Parker v. Lowery
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY I. EAGER, Special Commissioner.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing his petition on motion; since the order was not made without prejudice, it constitutes a final judgment. Rule 67.03, V.A.M.R. The sole question is whether the petition states a claim upon which relief can be granted. Appellant has filed a brief pro se; respondents have filed none. We shall refer to appellant as the plaintiff and to respondents as the defendants.
Plaintiff concedes that his suit is unique and without precedent. In essence it is a suit for alleged damage to plaintiff and to the “moral tone of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Pearson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Adamian v. Three Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Westerhold v. CarrollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Mezullo v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Parker v. ShermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Nelson Ex Rel. Wharton v. FreemanDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
- Hoover v. May Department Stores Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Household Finance Corporation v. AveryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Parker v. WallaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.