Legal Opinion

Bon Appetit Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. State Department of Employment

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1990No. 17122PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.*

This is an appeal by Bon Appetit from a decision of the Industrial Commission holding that certain independent contractors are nevertheless covered employees of Bon *1003Appetit under the provisions of I.C. § 72-1316(d)(2), and hence Bon Appetit is required to pay tax for unemployment compensation. Bon Appetit appeals on the sole basis that the statute is unconstitutional both on its face and as applied in violation of the equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution and art. 1 § 2 of the Idaho Constitution. We agree and reverse.

The facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Packard v. Joint School District No. 171Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Weller v. HopperIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. BreedIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Evans v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Sterling H. Nelson & Sons, Inc. v. BenderIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Coghlan v. Beta Theta Pi FraternityIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Aeschliman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center v. Minidoka County Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Evans v. AndrusIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API