Legal Opinion
Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 9, 1973No. Civ. A. Nos. 71-306, 70-968 and 69-1096PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 8, 1973, BY CHAVANOZ FOR WHICH THE ATTORNEY CLIENT AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
The court has before it for in camera inspection six hundred eighty-three (683) documents (as well as one hundred sixteen (116) photographs and one hundred seventy-six (176) pages of reports óf experiments, all claimed by producers as prepared in anticipation of litigation) production of which is sought by the Duplan Corporation and Burlington Industries (hereinafter referred to as the Throwsters) and withheld by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Speed v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
- Westhemeco Ltd. v. New Hampshire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Doubleday v. RuhDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Miles v. Bell Helicopter Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.