Legal Opinion

Smith v. Reinauer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1936No. 27020PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an airpeal from the district court of Caddo county, in an action wherein the plaintiffs, Fred Eeinauer and John Eeinauer, partners doing business under the style and firm name of Eeinauer Bros. Motor Company, a partnership, sued the defendant, IV. L. Smith, for a balance due on a promissory note.

The plaintiffs sold the defendant a second-hand automobile for the sum of $410, taking a used ear from defendant at $100, and the defendant giving a note in the sum of $310 representing the balance of the purchase price. The defendant made several payments oii the note, paying all but $70, for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Sarah Sitlington and Thomas O. Sitlington v. Robert Fulton and Ruby May FultonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Appliance Distributors, Inc. v. Mercury Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Morse General Tires, Inc. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API