Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. Eby

Suit by appellee, against appellant, to recover the value of a horse, killed by a train of cars on appellant’s road, at a point where it is alleged the same was not securely fenced. The complaint was in two paragraphs ; the second alleged negligence in the killing, and set out the facts showing wherein the said railroad was not securely fenced. Answer in general denial; jury trial; verdict for plaintiff; motion for a new trial for the following reasons:

1. The verdict of the jury is contrary to law.

2. The verdict of the jury is contrary to the evidence.

3. The verdict is not sustained by…