Legal Opinion

Harry J. Amell v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 16, 1968No. 387-64PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COWEN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs are civilian marine engineers employed by the Military Sea Transport Service, Atlantic Area (MSTS), Department of the Navy. They brought this suit to recover additional wages claimed to be due as a result of allegedly comparable pay increases which were granted to commercial marine engineers by commercial maritime carriers. 1 Since there is no dispute between the parties concerning the facts, the only issues to be resolved are legal questions raised by cross-motions for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Patterson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Crawford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blaha v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Honorable Harold Brown, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. National Maritime Union of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Baratt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  5. Benevento v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API