Legal Opinion

Peters v. Township of Hopewell

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 19, 1982No. Civ. A. 78-3108PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEBEVOISE, District Judge.

I. Nature of the Proceedings

Plaintiff in this action is Carl F. Peters, a resident of the Township of Hopewell, New Jersey. Defendants are the Township of Hopewell, a municipal corporation; James Johnson, Jeffrey Wittkop, Samuel Little and Richard Smith, who were retained by Township authorities to remove certain property from Peters’ premises in December, 1972; and Walter Reikowski who, in December, 1972 was Building Inspector and Zoning Officer of the Township.

Peters filed his complaint on December 22, 1978, charging that on December 27, 1972 defendants…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Francis Nolan Augustine v. John Doe, Deputy Sheriff, Lafayette ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Aitchison v. RaffianiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Hauptmann v. WilentzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  4. Russell Thomas Palmer, Jr. v. Ted S. Hudson, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Barnier v. SzentmiklosiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API