Legal Opinion
Barnier v. Szentmiklosi
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 9, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-60095PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOINER, District Judge.
On February 2, 1983, at the end of defendants’ proofs, the court directed a verdict for defendants on the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 count of plaintiffs’ complaint. This memorandum opinion is filed in support of that ruling.
FACTS
Briefly, the plaintiffs Timothy, Marie and Daniel Barnier filed suit on April 1, 1982 against the City of Milan, the Milan Police Department and two police department officers, William Szentmiklosi and Peter Campbell. The complaint alleged that on May 30, 1981, officers Szentmiklosi and Campbell stopped Timothy Barnier for a traffic…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Norman Braley v. City of Pontiac, Stanley Helgemo, Sergeant Arthur Rouse and Roland Garcia, OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Marcus Gumz, Cross-Appellant v. Douglas Morrissette and Lawrence Cloutier, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Gilmere v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Dennis Ray Kidd v. Robert O'Neil Mike Lomonaco Fairfax County Police Dept.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.